- 10:08:00 PM by mark
*
- So while mucking about cleaning useless files from my drives in hopes of not backing up a bunch of useless cruft I find this file named "New Microsoft Word Document.doc" in a folder full of downloads and temporary files. From Feb, 18 2000. In this file is simply:
This is just a test of the emergency fucking with windows settings system. If this had been a real emergency you would have had to screw with the settings from DOS. Thank you and good night.
I have no idea what the fuck I was doing, not the slightest... There isn't anything in the archives from that day to give me any clue, either...
- 8:50:00 PM by mark
*
- Cool, Baseball players duke it out over EverQuest. It is Dwarf vs. Paladin in an all club whack-a-thon! How very cool it is when your favorite video game is invading sports news...
- 8:37:00 PM by mark
*
- OK, today I saw a first. I've seen close to things this insane on the net but never quite this blatant. There was a spam complaint sent to the NOC at work. Since we are a datacenter and generally not directly involved in either the domainname or email being sent we normally just pass any complaints on to the correct customer, if it wasn't already copied there. Luckily our customers aren't the shady types so they are generally quick to respond to protect their good names.
This spam complaint would wind up being different. The person who was spammed was a "nanny" type who feels every spam is a direct, one-way ticket to jail for somebody, if only the proper authorities were made aware of the horiffic crime. (as you can tell, I'm completely able to hit delete once and be happy and if I note a pattern, I fire up ye olde tyme mail client and manfully type in a filter.) So the person nails just about everybody who might possibly care, meaning the addresses of the spammer and the abuse/postmaster/hostmaster trio on every provider that every came in contact with the spam or the website it off-handedly mentioned. (It wasn't direct advo mail.)
Of course, we are used to getting spammed with three copies of every spam a spam-nanny gets so that isn't surprising. And we are used to mildly snide or huffy return mails from weblist administrators saying "Ok ok, I removed them, all you had to do was ask, don't get your panties in a bunch." or some such thing. So that didn't suprise any of us either. I also wasn't too amazed at the chutzpah the spammer showed when he proceeded to mail-bomb the poor nanny with huge mail after mail until his mailbox was full. There are nasty little people all over and a lot of them think that being allowed to shout in people's ears is a god-given right, by golly.
What is unique in this case is that our moron spammer then proceeded to sign up all the administrator accounts at all of the service providers involved onto his spam list. Yep, no quicker way to to draw fire than to piss off the people who control your website, your website's network and your home connection than to send spam to the abuse addresses directly.
It is almost breathtaking. I'm actually looking forward to the conversation I'm going to have with his home DSL provider in the morning when I quote line and verse from their terms and conditions at the abuse person who is looking at the spam from him to their accounts.
In related news, it is now ok with Hormel Foods to say spammer.
- 3:40:00 PM by Dodd
*
- Techno Baby Steps - calls for bans on genetic research aren't just authoritarian; they exaggerate both the risks of such knowledge and the difficulty faced by people in putting new techniques to productive use.
- 12:46:00 PM by mark
*
- Mars Face article on CNN is a bit more slanted and goofy than you would normally expect. The article at Science NASA is a bit drier but still has a bit of a wink to it.
- 8:37:00 AM by DFA
*
- I was reading this comment on a Plastic.com discussion thread, when I about spat my morning caffeine on my monitor.
This person obviously doesn't understand science-fiction, much less good science fiction. To say that Star Wars (not to be confused with today's less-classic Star Wares...thanks George) and Rollerball are intrinsically better than the classics Logan's Run or Soylent Green is offensive and uninformed.
Certainly, Star Wars was more popular -- its audience spanned generations, classes, and genres. Rollerball didn't suck...or at least that's what the stupid hollywood bastards want us to think. But a pat dismissal of LR and SG is inane.
Star Wars was a space opera...a mish-mash of age-old epics retold with a technology flavor. Logan's Run was true sci-fi...dealing with humanity and its use, interaction with, and trouble with technology. More specfically, Logan's Run was prototypical Cyberpunk. Machines running rampant. Humanity in unrealized servitude to the machinery. Humanity's struggle to remain human.
Soylent Green...same thing. Humanity dealing with the problem's caused by their own actions. The "science" was a wrapper for social commentary. It was a far-flung future evaluation of our present-day trends. Granted, Charleton Heston certainly didn't need to be in the movie...or at least he needed a mess-load of laxative. But the movie still pointed fingers to hard questions. Where's the social commentary in Star Wars, other than the age-old Good Vs. Evil rhetoric? What's the driving human struggle in Rollerball?
Schmucks need to stop comparing apples and oranges. Just because a movie has lasers doesn't mean it is the same as every other movie that has lasers. Sheesh
- 12:03:00 AM by mark
*
- As long as you are going to invent your own personal universe, you might as well make "yourself" the star. And make yourself look like any number of supermodels.
All in all it is an amusing power-fantasy (in this case, fem-power) story with plenty of room for heroines to do just about anything they desire. And she has amassed quite a collection of powerful images of women, each woven into the back story developed so far.
The problem with such personal imagery is that a great deal of the meaning of the symbols is too deeply woven into the writer's head. A great deal of fanish fiction comes off this way, with a single powerful "author-esque" character running circles around the rest of the universe. Power fantasy is fine in small doses but the trick is to make the character both human and sympathetic to the readership. Getting too deep into your own personal power fantasy blinds you to the key universal elements of shared desire that make a character both leap off the page and help the reader get drawn into the character.
The writer of this stuff would be better served to write in dispassionate third person or tell the story from first person innocent bystander perspective. Living the starring role in your head is fine but tell it from outside so you can see how it all looks for a while. You should only dig into the heads of your power characters for brief moments, when you need to bring them down to earth.